Azithromycin treatment for short cervix with or without amniotic fluid sludge: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Preterm birth (PTB) is one of the leading causes of neonatal mortality and morbidity worldwide. A shortened cervix is a recognised risk factor for PTB, and amniotic fluid sludge (AFS) diagnosed on ultrasound may be suggestive of underlying inflammation or infection. AIMS: The aim is to determine if azithromycin, administered in cases of a shortened cervix, results in prolongation of gestation with improvements in neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study at three tertiary maternity services in Melbourne, Australia, between 2015 and 2020. Women with a singleton pregnancy were included if they had a cervical length of 15 mm or less at 13-24 weeks' gestation, with or without AFS. Exclusion criteria comprised multiple pregnancy, major fetal congenital anomaly, placenta praevia, prelabour premature rupture of membranes, vaginal bleeding and/or clinical signs suggestive of chorioamnionitis at the time of diagnosis of the short cervix. The results of antibiotic treatment with azithromycin were compared to those of no antibiotic treatment. The outcomes of interest were PTB, prelabour premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), chorioamnionitis and neonatal morbidity. RESULTS: A total of 374 women were included in the study, of whom 129 received azithromycin and 245 received no antibiotics. When adjusting for potential confounders, the adjusted risk of PTB overall was higher in the treatment group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36 (95% confidence interval 1.04-1.77) P = 0.023) with no differences found for PPROM, chorioamnionitis or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSION: These data do not support the routine use of azithromycin in women with a short cervix, including those with AFS detected on ultrasound.

Uso de indometacina y antibioterapia para el manejo de cérvix corto asintomático / Use of indomethacin and antibiotherapy for the management of asymptomatic short cervix

El cérvix corto es un factor de riesgo para el parto pretérmino con etiopatogenia variada y tratamiento aún por dilucidar. Se piensa que la indometacina y la antibioterapia podrían ser útiles en su manejo, lo que ayudaría a disminuir la morbimortalidad asociada al parto pretérmino. Dada la controversia existente se ha realizado una búsqueda bibliografía en las principales bases de datos sobre su uso y beneficio. El uso de indometacina podría evitar los casos de parto pretérmino en edades gestacionales extremas según los últimos estudios, con una tasa de efectos secundarios baja. Mientras tanto, la antibioterapia sería beneficiosa al intervenir en la resolución de la infección o inflamación estéril intraamniótica y del sludge. Sin embargo, el tratamiento de cérvix corto persiste en revisión y discusión, al igual que el uso o no de la amniocentesis para el estudio del líquido amniótico en estos casos. El consenso en cuanto a su manejo está dificultado por la gran variedad de actuaciones que se realizan en la práctica basadas en la experiencia clínica. Esto impide el establecimiento de una serie de pautas concretas de asistencia.(AU)

Short cervix is a risk factor for preterm delivery with varied aetiopathogenesis and its treatment is still to be specified. It is thought that indomethacin and antibiotherapy could be useful in its management, which would help reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm delivery. Given the existing controversy, a literature search about its use and benefit was conducted in the main databases. The use of indomethacin could prevent cases of preterm birth at extreme gestational ages according to recent studies, with a low rate of side effects. Meanwhile antibiotherapy would be beneficial in intervening in the resolution of infection or sterile intraamniotic inflammation and sludge. However, the treatment of short cervix remains under review and discussion, as does the use or otherwise of amniocentesis to study the amniotic fluid in these cases. Consensus on its management is hampered by the great variety of actions that are carried out in practice based on clinical experience. This prevents the establishment of a series of specific care guidelines.(AU)

Relationship of Amniotic Fluid Sludge and Short Cervix With a High Rate of Preterm Birth in Women After Cervical Cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: We aims to determine the relationship of amniotic fluid sludge (AFS) and/or short cervical length (CL, ≤25 mm) with a high rate of preterm birth in women after cervical cerclage. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among singleton pregnancies after cervical cerclage between January 2018 and December 2021. A total of 296 patients who underwent transvaginal ultrasound to evaluate CL and the presence of AFS within 2 weeks after cerclage were included. Pregnancy outcome after cerclage was analyzed in accordance with the presence of AFS and CL ≤25 mm. RESULTS: In patients with cerclage, AFS was an independent risk factor for preterm birth at <28 and <36 weeks but not for preterm birth at <32 weeks, and CL ≤25 mm was an independent risk factor for preterm birth at <28, <32, and <36 weeks. The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the association between the presence of AFS and short gestational age at delivery was statistically significant in women with CL ≤25 mm (log rank test, P = .000). The Cox regression analysis showed that these results remained significant after adjusting for confounding factors (P = .000). The negative linear relationships between AFS and CL (R = -0.454, P < .001) also explained the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: AFS and short cervix have a direct effect on pregnancies after cerclage. Mid-trimester AFS can become a supplementary ultrasound index for detecting preterm birth after cerclage in pregnant women with a short cervix.

Does amniotic fluid sludge result in preterm labor in pregnancies after assisted reproduction technology? A nested Case - Control study.

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the relationship between the Amniotic fluid Sludge exposure during pregnancy and the Preterm Labor (PTL) in pregnant women who had undergone Assisted Reproductive Technology procedures (ART) in Royan institute. MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a nested case-control study that was conducted on 110 eligible pregnant women who had undergone IVF procedure in Royan institute, Tehran, Iran. The final sample size was 63 subjects with Amniotic fluid Sludge and 67 subjects with normal Amniotic fluid. Delivery before 37 of gestation was considered as PTL.The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Royan institute and the written consent form was filled by participants. Data was entered to the SPSS (version 21, SPSS, Inc.). The baseline characteristics of the participants were described as absolute (n) and relative (%) frequencies for the covariates. Man Whitney and T-Test were used to compare the mean of covariates and the P-value lower than 0.05 was considered significant. The prevalence of the PTL was compared between two groups. RESULTS: The mean Gestational Age at delivery in case and control group were 36.46 ± 3.45 and 38.03 ± 1.61, respectively which was significant (p = .01). The prevalence of PTL in case and control group were 23.8% and 10.4% respectively which was significant (p = .04). The percentage of cases with cervical length less than 30 (mm) in case and control group were 28.6% and 10.4%, respectively (p = .008) and the percentage of cerclage in case and control group were 33.3% and 7.5% respectively, (p = .00) which were significant statistically. CONCLUSION: The amniotic fluid sludge has a direct effect on the cervical length of pregnancies after ART. In such cases, PTB will be probable in the presence of sludge in spite of preventive treatments such as cerclage.

Echogenic particles in the amniotic fluid of term low-risk pregnant women: does it have a clinical significance?

In this study, we aimed to analyse the clinical features of the third-trimester pregnant women, with echogenic amniotic fluid and to compare their obstetric and neonatal outcomes with pregnant women with normal amniotic fluid echogenicity. This case-control study was conducted in a tertiary antenatal care centre. A total of 560 term (37-42 weeks of gestation) singleton women; 280 with echogenic particles in amniotic fluid and 280 with clear amniotic fluid, who delivered within 24 h after the ultrasound scan were evaluated. The women in the two groups were similar in terms of age, parity, body mass index, foetal birth weight, and gestational age. More patients in the particulate amnion group had lower Apgar scores (<7) in 1st and 5th minutes than controls (p = .006, p = .031 respectively) however the rate of admission to neonatal intensive care was similar. Vernix stained amniotic fluid was more common in the study group (48.8%, p = .031), the rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid was similar in the study and control groups (9.6-9.2%, p = .881). The primary caesarean section rate was higher in women with particulate amnion (18.4%, p = .037). Echogenic particles in the amniotic fluid in the third trimester could not be attributed to meconium, however, higher rates of primary caesarean section may require further attention.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Previous studies showed that high-density intra-amniotic particles were possibly related to vernix caseosa, intra-amniotic bleeding, and meconium. The number of study groups in these studies was also limited.What do the results of this study add? Additional to other previous studies, we found an increased rate of intra-amniotic echogenic particles in male foetuses.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The presence of echogenic particles on ultrasound was not related to increased risk for the presence of meconium. Significantly more neonates born to mothers with intra-amniotic echogenic particles tended to have lower Apgar scores (<7), however, this significant difference did not affect the need for NICU admission. The presence of echogenic particles in the amniotic fluid of the third-trimester pregnant women could not be attributed to meconium and adverse perinatal outcomes, however, the higher rates of primary caesarean section may require further attention.

Antibiotic treatment of amniotic fluid "sludge" in patients during the second or third trimester with uterine contraction.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic treatment in patients with amniotic fluid (AF) "sludge" during the second or third trimester with uterine contractions and intact membranes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of women at 15-32 weeks of pregnancy with uterine contractions and intact membranes. Women with AF "sludge" were treated with an antibiotic regimen of ceftriaxone, clarithromycin, and metronidazole. Based on changes in AF "sludge," patients were divided into group A (disappearance of "sludge") and group B (persistent "sludge"). RESULTS: Women in group A (n=30) delivered later than those in group B (n=28). Group A showed a smaller initial size of "sludge" than group B (all P<0.05). Women in group A had a lower rate of preterm birth within 7 days, and before 28, 32, and 34 weeks of pregnancy, and composite neonatal morbidity and perinatal death than group B (all P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The administration of antibiotics may eradicate AF "sludge" in women in the second or third trimester with uterine contractions and intact membranes, which are associated with the initial size of "sludge." Patients with disappearing "sludge" had more favorable pregnancy and neonatal outcomes than those with persistent "sludge."

Effect of Antibiotic Treatment of Amniotic Fluid Sludge.

BACKGROUND: Amniotic fluid sludge refers to the sonographic presence of echogenic, free-floating aggregates of debris located within the amniotic cavity near the internal cervical os of women with intact membranes. Clinically, it is independently associated with increased obstetric, infectious, and neonatal morbidity, including: short cervix, chorioamnionitis, and an increased risk of preterm birth. It is thought to be infectious in nature and has been described as an intrauterine bacterial biofilm. There is little evidence on the impact of treatment with antibiotics on outcome. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether outpatient antibiotics administered to women with amniotic fluid sludge would reduce preterm birth risk compared to no antibiotic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients diagnosed with amniotic fluid sludge by transvaginal sonography between 15 and 25 weeks' gestation in the outpatient ultrasound unit at a single academic center between 2010 and 2017. Patients were segregated according to whether they were treated with oral antibiotics at the time of diagnosis. Women with multiple gestation, fetal anomalies, preterm rupture of membranes prior to initial diagnosis of amniotic fluid sludge, and active preterm labor placenta previa and/or suspected accreta were excluded from analysis. Primary outcome of preterm birth at less than 37 weeks' gestation was compared by univariate and regression analysis to control for potential co-linear and/or confounding variables. Additional outcomes were compared by univariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were initially identified, and 97 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these patients, 51 were treated with oral antibiotics (46 azithromycin and 5 moxifloxacin), and 46 were not treated. The overall incidence of preterm birth at <37 weeks was 49.4 % (48 of 97) and preterm birth <28 weeks was 22.7% (22 of 97). There was no significant difference in preterm birth, either at <37 weeks (P = .47) or <28 weeks (P = .83) between the treated and untreated women. After adjusting for race, body mass index, tobacco use, cervical length, and preterm birth history, antibiotic treatment did not reduce the risk of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.3; confidence interval, 0.77-1.9). No differences were seen in the incidence of preterm premature rupture of membranes (P = .94) or median latency from diagnosis to delivery (P = .47). Birthweight (P = .99), sepsis (P = .53), intraventricular hemorrhage (P = .95), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (P = .08) were not affected by antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic treatment did not affect the incidence of either clinical or histologic chorioamnionitis (P = .92 and .14, respectively) or histologic stage 2-3 maternal or fetal inflammation (P = .94 and 0.58, respectively). Sonographic resolution of amniotic fluid sludge on first subsequent scan was seen in 34% of antibiotic-treated women and 43% of untreated women (P = .42). There was no difference in latency from diagnosis to delivery or mean gestational age at delivery according to whether sludge resolved or persisted at the first subsequent scan (P = .14 for each). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic treatment of amniotic fluid sludge is not associated with a reduction in premature birth. Likewise, antibiotic treatment of amniotic fluid sludge was not associated with improvement in other obstetric, neonatal, or pathologic variables. These findings suggest that the presumed infectious nature of sludge and subsequent adverse outcomes are not treated or improved by administration of azithromycin following midtrimester sonographic diagnosis.

Amniotic immune biomarkers as risk factors in women with different symptoms of threatened late miscarriage.

PROBLEM: To investigate risk factors that can help identify the possibility of pregnancy loss in threatened late miscarriage (TLM) patients with and without spontaneous uterine contractions. METHOD OF STUDY: Amniotic immune biomarkers (IL2ß receptor, IL6, IL8, IL10, IL1ß, and TNFα) were assayed, and "sludge" was assessed. Patients without intrauterine infections were treated and followed up until delivery, and pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The two groups were compared for the differences in biomarker levels and "sludge," and the independent associations of biomarkers, "sludge," and other maternal factors with late miscarriage were investigated. RESULTS: The amniotic levels of IL2ßR, IL8, and TNFα were higher in the group with contractions (P < .05). When considered alone, each of the six biomarkers was significantly associated with late miscarriage in the no-contractions group and four of these (IL8, IL10, IL1ß, and TNFα) in the contractions group (P < .05). Biomarker levels were correlated, and in multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was an independent effect only for IL8 in the no-contractions group (HR = 18.16, 95% CI: 5.75-57.43) and TNFα in the contractions group (HR = 4.11, 95% CI: 1.68-10.08). For patients with contractions, IL10, IL8, and IL1ß were different in those with and without "sludge," but no such difference was seen in the no-contractions group. CONCLUSION: For TLM patients without intrauterine infections, amniotic immune biomarkers differ between patients with different symptoms, not only for their levels but also for the impact of these biomarkers on the risk of late miscarriage. These findings suggest that the symptoms of TLM should be considered in the study of miscarriage risk.

Is cervical length evaluated by transvaginal ultrasonography helpful in detecting true preterm labor?

Objective: To investigate whether sonographic cervical markers can identify women in true preterm labor and predict delivery within 7 d and before 34 or 37 gestational weeks.Methods: This was a prospective observational study of women with singleton pregnancies and intact membranes given a diagnosis of preterm labor between 25 and 34 weeks and 6 d of gestation and who underwent transvaginal evaluation of the following characteristics: cervical length (CL), CL zeta score, absence of endocervical glandular echo, presence of cervical funneling, and presence of amniotic fluid sludge. The outcomes of interest were spontaneous delivery within 7 d of preterm labor and spontaneous delivery before 34 or 37 gestational weeks.Results: The inclusion criteria were met by 126 women, 31 (25%) of whom were excluded and 95 were analyzed. The median gestational age at admission was 31.9 weeks. The median CL at preterm labor was 22.3 mm (range: 0-42.8 mm). The delivery occurred within 7 d of presentation in 13 (13.7%) cases. Delivery before 34 weeks occurred in 16 (16.8%) cases and before 37 weeks in 40 (42.1%) cases. Logistic regression analysis showed CL in millimeters was an independent predictor of delivery within 7 d (OR 0.918, 95% CI 0.862-0.978, p = .008). For birth before 34 weeks, the predictor was gestational age at admission (OR 0.683, 95% CI 0.539-0.866, p = .002) and before 37 weeks, the presence of cervical funneling (OR 3.778, 95% CI 1.460-9.773, p = .006). The CL ≤ 15 mm had sensitivity and specificity values of 77 and 77%, respectively, and good accuracy (88%) for prediction of delivery within 7 d.Conclusion: The evaluation of the cervix by transvaginal ultrasound in women in preterm labor predicted delivery within 7 d and helped distinguish between true and false labor. The analysis of CL zeta score was not an independent factor to predict delivery in 7 d.

Effects of antibiotic therapy in women with the amniotic fluid "sludge" at 15-24 weeks of gestation on pregnancy outcomes.

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of antibiotic therapy for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with the amniotic fluid "sludge" at 15-24 weeks of gestation.Methods: 245 women underwent transvaginal ultrasound cervical length measurement at 15-24 weeks of pregnancy and 29 out of them with amniotic fluid "sludge" were included in the study. Eight women with the "sludge" had cervical length >25 mm (Group I), seven-an asymptomatic short cervix (Group IIa) and 14 women with a short cervix had symptoms like low abdominal pain, back pain, and menstrual-like cramps (Group IIb). All participants received intravenous, oral and/or vaginal antibiotic therapy. Participants in Group IIa were additionally given vaginal progesterone (VP), and in Group IIb-VP and indomethacin. Placentas from women with preterm birth (PTB) underwent histological examination.Results: The amniotic fluid "sludge" detected at an ultrasound scan between 15-24 weeks of gestation was associated with long-term maternal infections, histological chorioamnionitis, and was viewed as a marker of intra-amniotic infection. Absence of intravenous antibiotic therapy during midtrimester of pregnancy in these women was associated with neonatal infection with intrauterine onset in 61.1%, postpartum endometritis in 23.1%, and rate of PTB 46.2%. Intravenous antibiotic therapy eliminated sonographic presence of the sludge and resulted in prevented of neonatal and postpartum infections, prevented the risk of PTB in women with the cervical length >25 mm, in those with an asymptomatic short cervix receiving VP, and in 70% of symptomatic women with a short cervix, who received them in combination VP/indomethacin. For those women whose approach was not fully beneficial, it allowed to delay delivery in 11-17 weeks.Conclusions: Although we found that intravenous antibiotic therapy at 15-24 weeks of gestation in women with amniotic fluid "sludge" can protect from infection-related complications and demonstrated high beneficial effects of adding antibiotics to anti-inflammatory drug (indomethacin) and/or VP in women with a short cervix, further larger studies are needed.

Antibiotic treatment for patients with amniotic fluid "sludge" to prevent spontaneous preterm birth: A historically controlled observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Amniotic fluid "sludge" has been associated with an increased rate of spontaneous preterm delivery before 35 weeks, a higher frequency of clinical and histologic chorioamnionitis in a high-risk population. Only one study evaluating the use of antibiotics in the presence of amniotic fluid "sludge" showed reduced rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <34 weeks. The objective of this study was to evaluate routine antibiotic treatment in the presence of amniotic fluid "sludge" for prevention of preterm delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A historically controlled observational study was performed between October 2010 and January 2015, including a total of 86 pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and the presence of amniotic fluid "sludge" at ultrasound. Women admitted from October 2010 to September 2012 received no treatment with antibiotics, whereas those admitted from October 2012 to January 2015, received routinely clindamycin and first-generation cephalosporin. The groups were compared considering the incidence of spontaneous preterm delivery. The effect of antimicrobials was also compared in the subgroup of women at high risk for spontaneous preterm birth (ie, cervical length ≤25 mm, history of spontaneous preterm birth, previous spontaneous loss in the second trimester, Mullerian malformations or cervical conization). RESULTS: Antibiotic therapy reduced the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth at <34 weeks (13.2% vs 38.5%, P = 0.047) in women at high-risk for preterm birth, with an odds ratio of 0.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.99). Birthweight was significantly different between the study groups (2961 ± 705 vs. 2554 ± 819 g, respectively; P = 0.028), with no statistical significance for others variables. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that antibiotic treatment in high-risk pregnant women with amniotic fluid "sludge" can be effective in the reduction of the frequency of spontaneous preterm delivery and can increase the birthweight.

Sludge reflects intra-amniotic inflammation with or without microorganisms.

PROBLEM: To investigate whether amniotic fluid (AF) "sludge" in patients with preterm labor (PTL) with intact membranes is related to intra-amniotic infection or inflammation. METHOD OF STUDY: 105 PTL patients before 29 weeks' gestation were enrolled. AF "sludge" was evaluated by transvaginal sonography. Microorganisms were identified in AF by our newly established PCR method using a eukaryote-made thermostable DNA polymerase. RESULTS: AF "sludge" was present in 18.1% (19/105) of patients. The results obtained in the AF "sludge" group vs the no "sludge" group were as follows: (i) a similar positive rate of microorganisms in AF by PCR, 31.6% (6/19) vs 38.4% (33/86); (ii) a higher level of AF interleukin-8, 15.2 (0.2-381.5) ng/mL vs 5.8 (0.1-413.7) ng/mL; P = .005); and (3) a higher frequency of histological chorioamnionitis, 52.6% (10/19) vs 23.3% (20/86); P = .010. CONCLUSION: The presence of AF "sludge" is related to intra-amniotic inflammation with or without microorganisms.

Amniotic fluid "sludge"; prevalence and clinical significance of it in asymptomatic patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study is to determine prevalence and clinical significance of the presence of amniotic fluid "sludge" among asymptomatic patients at high-risk for spontaneous preterm delivery, prospectively. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In our study, 99 patients at high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery were evaluated for the presence of amniotic fluid sludge with transvaginal ultrasonography at 20-22, 26-28, and 32-34 gestational weeks, prospectively; between August 2009 and October 2010 in Hacettepe University Hospital. And, these patients were followed up for their delivery weeks and pregnancy outcomes. We defined the high-risk group as the patients possessing one or more of the followings; a history of spontaneous preterm delivery, recent urinary tract infections, polyhydramnios, uterine leiomyomas, müllerian duct anomalies, and history of cone biyopsy or LEEP. Patients with multiple gestations, placenta previa, fetal anomalies, or symptoms of preterm labor at first examination were excluded. We have obtained ethical board approval from Hacettepe University (16.07.2009-HEK/No:09-141-59). RESULTS: The prevalence of amniotic fluid sludge in the study population was 19,6% (18/92). The rates of spontaneous preterm delivery at <37 weeks of gestation were 66,7% (12/18), within the patients with sludge and 27,0% (20/74) within the patients without sludge. Patients with sludge had a higher rate of spontaneous preterm delivery (p = 0.002). A higher proportion of neonates born to patients with amniotic fluid sludge had a neonatal morbidity (50% (9/18) vs. 24,3% (18/74), p = 0.044) and died in the perinatal period, (p = 0,013) than those born to patients without sludge. When we combined sludge and cervical lenght (CL) (<25 mm) and used it as a screening test to identify women at risk for preterm delivery; it catched more women with preterm delivery, (p = 0.000). While sensitivity of sludge was 37,5%, and sensitivity of CL was 34%, sensitivity of "sludge positive or CL ≤25 mm" was 56% for preterm birth (PTB) in high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of amniotic fluid sludge is 19,6% and "sludge" is an independent risk factor for spontaneous preterm delivery among asymptomatic patients at high-risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. PTB is by far the leading cause of infant mortality, and prevention of PTB has been an elusive goal. When sludge added to screening, we can catch more PTB.

Amniotic fluid "sludge" is an independent risk factor for preterm delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and the clinical significance of amniotic fluid "sludge" (AFS) in asymptomatic patients at low and high risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. METHOD: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 195 singleton pregnancies at low or high risk for preterm birth (PTB) between the 16th and 26th weeks. Cervical length (CL) <25 mm and the presence of AFS were evaluated. The risk for preterm delivery before 28, 32, 35 and 37 weeks were determined according to the presence of AFS, CL < 25 mm and history of high risk for PTB. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to compare variables. RESULTS: AFS was an independent risk factor for PTB < 35 weeks (OR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.13-8.34, p = 0.027) but not for PTB < 28, 32 and 37 weeks. CL < 25 mm was an independent risk factor for PTB < 28, 32 and 35 but not for PTB < 37 weeks. High risk for PTB was not found as an independent risk factor for PTB. CONCLUSION: AFS is an independent risk factor for PTB before 35 weeks.

Impact of amniotic fluid "sludge" on the risk of preterm delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of amniotic fluid "sludge" (AFS) on the risk of preterm delivery and to describe the effect of antibiotic treatment in that situation. METHODS: Case-control study including singleton pregnancies with or without AFS, between 15-32 weeks of gestation. Factors associated with preterm delivery before 32 weeks, 34 weeks and 37 weeks were evaluated with univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Since all women with AFS in this study were treated with antibiotics, a historical comparison was performed with similar patients with AFS found before 2007 and not treated with antibiotics. RESULTS: AFS was observed in 90/1220 patients (7.4%). AFS was associated with shorter cervical length, greater body mass index, cervical cerclage and preterm birth before 28 weeks. However, after adjustment, AFS did not remain associated with preterm delivery before 32 or 34 weeks. The historical comparison suggested that azithromycin could significantly reduce the risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks (odds ratio: 0.2; 95% CI: 0.04-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: AFS, treated with azithromycin, was associated with a higher risk of prematurity, but not independently after adjustment for cervical length and second trimester vaginal bleeding. Further studies need to evaluate the effect of antibiotics in pregnancies with AFS.

Clinical significance of amniotic fluid sludge in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the clinical significance of amniotic fluid (AF) sludge in twin pregnancies with a short cervix. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated twin pregnancies with a short cervical length that had an ultrasound between 16 and 26 weeks (n = 78). Pregnancy outcomes in those with sludge (n = 27) and those without (n = 51) were compared. Outcome variables included gestational age at delivery, premature rupture of the membranes, chorioamnionitis, funisitis, composite neonatal morbidity, and perinatal death. For statistical analysis, the first-born (A) and second-born (B) twins were studied separately. RESULTS: The prevalence of AF sludge was 34.6% (27 of 78). Pregnancies with sludge delivered earlier (27.2 ± 5.6 weeks vs 31.0 ± 4.05 weeks, P < .01) and had a higher rate of extreme prematurity (<26 weeks: 52.2% [12 of 23] vs 15.6% [5 of 32]; P < .01). Both twins had higher rates of histological chorioamnionitis (twin A, 50.0% [13 of 26] vs 12.8% [6 of 47]; P < .01; twin B, 42.3% [11 of 26] vs 13.3% [6 of 45]; P < .01) and neonatal death (twin A, 33.3% [9 of 27] vs 3.9% [2 of 51]; P < .01; twin B, 33.3% [9 of 27] vs 6.0% [3 of 50]; P = .01). Higher rates of funisitis (23.1% [6 of 26] vs 4.3% [2 of 47]; P = .02) and composite neonatal morbidity were observed for twin A only (66.7% [14 of 21] vs 37.5% [18 of 48]; P = .04). CONCLUSION: The presence of AF sludge in twin pregnancies with a short cervix is a risk factor for extreme prematurity, histological chorioamnionitis, and perinatal death. Twin A had higher rates of funisitis and neonatal morbidity in the presence of AF sludge.

Enlarging amniotic fluid 'sludge' in preterm labor associated with severe course of sepsis and recurrent tension pneumothorax in the infant.

Amniotic fluid 'sludge' (AFS) is defined as the presence of dense aggregates of hyperechogenic material in close proximity to the internal cervical os. The presence of AFS is an independent risk factor for impending preterm delivery, histological chorioamnionitis, and microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in patients with spontaneous preterm labor with intact membranes, and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. We describe a case showing enlarging AFS on transvaginal ultrasound in a patient with impending preterm labor, followed by chorioamnionitis and emergency cesarean section at 28 weeks of gestation, resulting in a severe course of sepsis and recurrent tension pneumothorax in the infant. Such a case has not been reported as far as we know. Based on our case, sonographic findings of enlarging AFS may be a predictor of severe neonatal outcomes in a case with preterm labor even though the maternal symptoms of inflammation are not obvious.